Guides for Author

To ensure a seamless submission process and to enhance the visibility and impact of your work, please adhere to the following guidelines for author descriptions:


  1. Format your manuscript according to the guidelines specified in the Enagram template, using Cambria font 11pts.
  2. Clearly present your research question, methodology, findings, and conclusions.
  3. Include relevant figures, tables, and equations, ensuring they are clear and appropriately labeled.
  1. Craft a concise and informative title that reflects the essence of your research, using Cambria font 12 pts in bold.
  2. Write a structured abstract summarizing the background, objectives, methods, results, and conclusions of your study.


  1. Provide a set of keywords that accurately represent the main themes of your research, using Cambria font 11 pts
  2. Select terms that enhance the discoverability of your article.
  1. Include a comprehensive author description section detailing the academic and professional backgrounds of all contributors, using Cambria font 11 pts.
  2. Specify each author’s affiliation, academic degree, and current position.
  3. Provide contact details for the corresponding author using an active email address.

To ensure transparency, we recommend that authors submit a document detailing their specific contributions to the paper using the following indicators:

  1. Conceptualization and Design
  2. Data Collection and Analysis
  3. Methodology
  4. Investigation and Experiment
  5. Manuscript Drafting
  6. Writing and Editing
  7. Funding acquisition

Adding additional authors after manuscript acceptance is strictly prohibited. This policy is in place to maintain the integrity of the authorship and ensure transparency in the contribution process. Authors should finalize their authorship list during the submission and peer-review stages.

Acknowledge any funding sources, collaborations, or institutions that supported your research, using Cambria font.

Include supplementary material (if any) that enhances the understanding of your research, formatted in Cambria font.

Authors are advised to meticulously contemplate the composition and sequence of authors prior to submitting their manuscript, presenting the final list during the initial submission. Any modifications, whether it be additions, removals, or reordering of author names, are permissible solely before the manuscript attains acceptance and must receive approval from the journal Editor. It is essential to emphasize that alterations to authorship can only be made during the initial submission stage and will not be entertained once the manuscript has achieved acceptance.

Our peer-review process employs a rigorous blind review system involving three independent referees. Manuscripts are meticulously evaluated without revealing the authors’ identities, ensuring an unbiased and impartial assessment. This meticulous review by three expert referees aims to uphold the highest standards of academic rigor, providing constructive feedback and recommendations to enhance the quality and credibility of submitted research. The blind review process is a cornerstone of our commitment to fostering excellence and integrity in scholarly publishing.

Maintaining proper referencing is paramount for upholding academic integrity, facilitating easy source verification, and enhancing the overall credibility of a manuscript. To streamline this process, we strongly recommend utilizing reference management tools such as EndNote or Mendeley to seamlessly incorporate all pertinent references. It is advisable to exercise caution against excessive citations from specific authors to ensure a balanced and unbiased scholarly approach. When applying citations to the manuscript, kindly adhere to the Vancouver style with round brackets only.

It is imperative to note that the submission of manuscripts without employing a reference manager for citation and referencing purposes is strictly prohibited. Authors are encouraged to embrace best practices in referencing to contribute to the scholarly rigor and reliability of their work. Please look at the example below:


Your manuscript content here will serve as the foundation for groundbreaking research in our scholarly community (1). We eagerly anticipate the wealth of knowledge, insights, and innovations that your manuscript will contribute to the advancement of your field (2-4). Through meticulous review and collaboration, we aim to ensure that ‘your manuscript content here’ makes a significant and lasting impact in the academic landscape(5, 6). Thank you for choosing our platform as the venue to share your valuable research.



  1. Turnbull D, Chugh R, Luck J. Systematic-narrative hybrid literature review: A strategy for integrating a concise methodology into a manuscript. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. 2023;7(1):100381.
  2. Malay DS. Effective Manuscript Preparation and Submission. Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery. 2023.
  3. Bianchi F, García-Costa D, Grimaldo F, Squazzoni F. Measuring the effect of reviewers on manuscript change: A study on a sample of submissions to Royal Society journals (2006–2017). Journal of Informetrics. 2022;16(3):101316.
  4. Awad C, Martinek A. Chapter 102 – Manuscript preparation. In: Eltorai AEM, Liu T, Chand R, Kalva SP, editors. Translational Interventional Radiology: Academic Press; 2023. p. 507-13.
  5. Castagnetti M, Bagli D, Fossum M. Reviewing scientific manuscripts. Journal of Pediatric Urology. 2018;14(2):133-4.
  6. Haller DG. PG 8.01 Writing and submitting an outstanding scientific manuscript. European Journal of Cancer. 2012;48:S8-S9.